<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Sort of Patriots Resign in Protest But Keep Silent to Protect Their Party?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pensitoreview.com/2007/05/18/why-sort-of-patriots-resign-but-keep-silent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2007/05/18/why-sort-of-patriots-resign-but-keep-silent/</link>
	<description>News and Opinion on Politics and Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:12:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cal1942</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2007/05/18/why-sort-of-patriots-resign-but-keep-silent/comment-page-1/#comment-331325</link>
		<dc:creator>cal1942</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 18:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/2007/05/18/why-do-top-bush-officials-resign-in-protest-but-keep-silent/#comment-331325</guid>
		<description>Taking off on JohnDWoodsSr above. I agree but it should also be noted that there are people in lower positions running far greater personal risks including financial hardship, possible legal action, etc. who do speak out as whistleblowers or who give information to investigative reporters with the always present danger of exposure.  These are people who do not have personal fortunes or wealthy family backers.
The real moral decay in our society is among the nation&#039;s elites. That sad fact puts us in peril as never before.

I felt from the start of the Bush administration that the selection of Colin Powell as Secretary of State was a sign that the administration wanted a free hand to embark on any foreign adventure without fear of exposure from inside the ranks, he was perfect for their purposes. A man of media created credibility not quite like the rest of their lot. For the fate of the nation he was the worst possible choice.

When pundits said that Powell would be a moderating influence on the administration I laughed out loud.

None of our pundits seemed to understand that Colin Powell&#039;s rise to the top of the military was based on his significant ability to PROTECT those above him.

The damn fools should have known that Powell was strictly a salute and yes sir guy lacking any fundamental moral fiber.

He is an intelligent man who knew very well that invading Iraq was a catastrophic blunder for the nation, but, he was first and foremost a good little soldier who always follows orders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking off on JohnDWoodsSr above. I agree but it should also be noted that there are people in lower positions running far greater personal risks including financial hardship, possible legal action, etc. who do speak out as whistleblowers or who give information to investigative reporters with the always present danger of exposure.  These are people who do not have personal fortunes or wealthy family backers.<br />
The real moral decay in our society is among the nation&#8217;s elites. That sad fact puts us in peril as never before.</p>
<p>I felt from the start of the Bush administration that the selection of Colin Powell as Secretary of State was a sign that the administration wanted a free hand to embark on any foreign adventure without fear of exposure from inside the ranks, he was perfect for their purposes. A man of media created credibility not quite like the rest of their lot. For the fate of the nation he was the worst possible choice.</p>
<p>When pundits said that Powell would be a moderating influence on the administration I laughed out loud.</p>
<p>None of our pundits seemed to understand that Colin Powell&#8217;s rise to the top of the military was based on his significant ability to PROTECT those above him.</p>
<p>The damn fools should have known that Powell was strictly a salute and yes sir guy lacking any fundamental moral fiber.</p>
<p>He is an intelligent man who knew very well that invading Iraq was a catastrophic blunder for the nation, but, he was first and foremost a good little soldier who always follows orders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neoconvict</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2007/05/18/why-sort-of-patriots-resign-but-keep-silent/comment-page-1/#comment-331273</link>
		<dc:creator>neoconvict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 18:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/2007/05/18/why-do-top-bush-officials-resign-in-protest-but-keep-silent/#comment-331273</guid>
		<description>Impeachment. It&#039;s what&#039;s for dinner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impeachment. It&#8217;s what&#8217;s for dinner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2007/05/18/why-sort-of-patriots-resign-but-keep-silent/comment-page-1/#comment-331187</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 14:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/2007/05/18/why-do-top-bush-officials-resign-in-protest-but-keep-silent/#comment-331187</guid>
		<description>Great take on the recent Ashcroft, Gonzales revelations. While Ashcroft should be commended for his refusal to authorize a criminal enterprise, he still is a bad actor in this play. 

He gave interviews after he left office where he backed Bush 100%. No  mention(that I know of) of that shameful episode in his hospital bedroom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great take on the recent Ashcroft, Gonzales revelations. While Ashcroft should be commended for his refusal to authorize a criminal enterprise, he still is a bad actor in this play. </p>
<p>He gave interviews after he left office where he backed Bush 100%. No  mention(that I know of) of that shameful episode in his hospital bedroom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.buzzflash.net</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2007/05/18/why-sort-of-patriots-resign-but-keep-silent/comment-page-1/#comment-330419</link>
		<dc:creator>www.buzzflash.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 17:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/2007/05/18/why-do-top-bush-officials-resign-in-protest-but-keep-silent/#comment-330419</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What Sort of Patriots Resign in Protest But Keep Silent to Protect Their Party?...&lt;/strong&gt;

His secretary of state, attorney general, CIA director and their aides have resigned in protest over Bush&#039;s malfeasance only to remain silent to protect the GOP. Republicans are quick to slur the patriotism of Democrats but men who stand mute while Bu...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What Sort of Patriots Resign in Protest But Keep Silent to Protect Their Party?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>His secretary of state, attorney general, CIA director and their aides have resigned in protest over Bush&#8217;s malfeasance only to remain silent to protect the GOP. Republicans are quick to slur the patriotism of Democrats but men who stand mute while Bu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnDWoodSr</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2007/05/18/why-sort-of-patriots-resign-but-keep-silent/comment-page-1/#comment-330371</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnDWoodSr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 17:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/2007/05/18/why-do-top-bush-officials-resign-in-protest-but-keep-silent/#comment-330371</guid>
		<description>A person in our government, having been either elected or appointed to a high position, has had whatever sense of morality, duty, ethics and integrity they possessed compromised by the process of party politics that got them where they are. The process demands total loyalty to party, not country. As a result, people are badly conflicted when they witness bad acts by other members of their party, and very few remember that their overriding allegience should be to the nation that they live in. It&#039;s a very rare person indeed who retains the courage and moral fibre necessary to expose wrongdoing whereever and whenever it occurs.
Real integrity is the sign of a real patriot, and to the detriment of us all, we don&#039;t have very many people who exhibit it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A person in our government, having been either elected or appointed to a high position, has had whatever sense of morality, duty, ethics and integrity they possessed compromised by the process of party politics that got them where they are. The process demands total loyalty to party, not country. As a result, people are badly conflicted when they witness bad acts by other members of their party, and very few remember that their overriding allegience should be to the nation that they live in. It&#8217;s a very rare person indeed who retains the courage and moral fibre necessary to expose wrongdoing whereever and whenever it occurs.<br />
Real integrity is the sign of a real patriot, and to the detriment of us all, we don&#8217;t have very many people who exhibit it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

