Are we to believe that “just one time” he wandered into a den of indecency and was tricked into slipping into something more comfortable . . . a Depends?????

ya right, and God told George to invade Iraq . . .

So, Vitter just needs to submit a DNA sample to prove Cortez wrong.

My guess is that Vitter is guilty as charged.

He took a week to address the growing problem–not the one in his pants–so he could consult spin doctors and check on a focus group or two to see what to say to the quivering masses.

He needs to submit a DNA sample and preferrably, not one stuck to a blue dress.

In claiming “those stories are not true,” Vitter specifically did not say which of the hundreds of stories of various topics are not true. While local talk-show immediately reported that Vitter denied the Canal Street Brothel accusation, in fact, Vitter did no such thing.

In fact, such a declaration would have provided fuel for the kind of action the media took in covering Gary Hart. And, of course, if another shoe drops, Vitter’s always got the ability to say he didn’t specify WHICH New Orleans stories were false.

But if the allegations about his longtime connection with prostitute Wendy Cortez are false, he should come out and specifically say “I did not have sex with that woman.”

In 1987, when Dem frontrunner Gary Hart challenged reporters to prove he was having an affair, they did — and Hart’s campaign was fatally upended. Yesterday, Sen. David Vitter, whose number appeared five times on the DC Madam’s call lists, made a si…