Jail Cells in U.S. Capitol Building Could Be Reopened for Rove, Miers and Bolten

Inherent contempt: Based on his behavior in the past few weeks, Pres. Bush must be hiding something really nefarious. He has forbidden his aides — including former legal counsel Harriet Miers, current chief of Staff Josh Bolten and now Karl Rove — from even showing up to testify about the firing for political reasons of U.S. attorneys.

“Perhaps it is time for Congress to dust off its rusty inherent contempt power, reopen the Capitol hoosegow, get some of the Capitol Police’s finest, and put a couple of people behind bars for a few days.”
— Norm Ornstein

When Democrats in Congress threatened the aides with contempt of Congress, Bush announced that the Justice Dept. would ignore the charges. In other words, his is an imperial presidency, and Emperor Bush is accountable to no one.

This leaves the Democrats with one option: charging the White House aides with inherent contempt:

Under this process, the procedure for holding a person in contempt involves only the chamber concerned. Following a contempt citation, the person cited for contempt is arrested by the Sergeant-at-Arms for the House or Senate, brought to the floor of the chamber, held to answer charges by the presiding officer, and then subject to punishment that the House may dictate (usually imprisonment for punishment reasons, imprisonment for coercive effect, or release from the contempt citation).

So assuming Rove, Miers, Bolten and other White House aides are found guilty, they would not be remanded into the federal justice system, which is overseen by the president, but rather would be jailed in the U.S. Capitol Building under the jurisdiction of the Legislative Branch.

Yes, there are jail cells in the Capitol Complex, and they once used quite frequently, according to congressional expert Norm Ornstein:

In the case of contempt, Congress began early in its history to protect its ability to compel testimony to it by private citizens and executive officials by arresting and jailing — in the Capitol — those who refused to cooperate. The first case dates to 1795. The Supreme Court in 1821, in Anderson v. Dunn, recognized Congress’ inherent power but noted that the power was limited to “the least power adequate to the end proposed,” and the court limited imprisonment, saying it could not last beyond the adjournment of Congress. Congress passed a statute in 1857 to allow longer terms of imprisonment as well as allowing it to turn contempt cases over to the courts for indictment and trial, with penalties including fines of “not more than $1,000 nor less than $100” and imprisonment “in a common jail of not less than one month nor more than twelve months.”

The practice in the 20th century, at least, has been to turn cases over to the Justice Department to handle and allow the courts to intervene if the case involved a tension between legislative and executive prerogatives; 1934 was the last time Congress used its inherent power and handled the prosecution of a contempt case itself.

Norm Ornstein’s bottom line: “Perhaps it is time for Congress to dust off its rusty inherent contempt power, reopen the Capitol hoosegow, get some of the Capitol Police’s finest, and put a couple of people behind bars for a few days or a bit longer to show that there is indeed recourse here–that the blanket assertion of executive privilege and untethered executive power just does not wash.”

Yesterday, even the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee mentioned the option of jailing the Bushies in-house:

Specter later circled back to Gonzales on the matter, warning him: “My suggestion to you is you review your testimony to find out if your credibility has been breached to the point of being actionable,” Specter said. The maximum penalty for being caught lying to Congress is five years in prison and a fine of $250,000 per count. Specter wryly noted to reporters during a break that there is a jail in the Capitol complex.

One possible fly in the ointment about the congressional trials: if they were held in the Senate, rather than the House, they would be presided over by the president of the Senate, who happens to be Vice Pres. Dick Cheney.

On the other hand, presidential pardons appear not to apply to civil contempt procedures such as inherent contempt because it is not an “offense against the United States” or an offense against “the dignity of public authority.”


  • Pingback: www.buzzflash.net

  • July 26, 2007 - 5:38 pm | Permalink

    Roses are red, violets are not blue. Justice served is long overdue. May all the seeds they have sown be returned to them threefold. Enough is enough! This lawless bullshit has gotten way beyond old.

  • July 26, 2007 - 8:35 pm | Permalink

    I know that Rove, Miers, etal are contemptuous and contemptible, but is there a similar legal term that would apply if they were jailed in the Capitol? Contemptee, maybe?

  • Pingback: Bring It On! National News » Everyone Needs a Fantasy

  • Beetle
    June 20, 2012 - 7:41 am | Permalink

    I wonder if Congress will dust off this law for AG Holder.

    • Madison
      June 20, 2012 - 9:15 am | Permalink

      If so, your Dear Leader’s guy, AG Michael Mukasey, will go first.

  • Pingback: If the House REALLY wants to have press the contempt issue…

  • Michelle
    June 29, 2012 - 5:02 am | Permalink

    Seems like an appropriate end for Holder, seeing as how this contempt charge will go to a Obama appointee and campaign contributor.

    Sic Semper Socialist Traitors!

    • Madison
      June 30, 2012 - 3:37 am | Permalink

      Clueless Fox Viewer: If you were exposed to regular news outlets, not just propaganda, you’d know that Boehner and Issa have played you tea baggers for fools. The contempt vote was nothing more than a Soviet-style show trial. There never were going to be consequences for Holder because they knew a) he did not do anything illegal or even wrong and b) that the contempt vote would go nowhere — just as even the valid, well-deserved contempt votes against Bush’s people went nowhere.

      First, by law, these matters are handled by the Justice Department. I’m sure you have no clue which government department Holder runs, so look it up. Second, the matter drops when the current Congress is over, which is in January, so even if it had moved forward in court, it would have been dropped in five months anyway.

      If you were aware of what’s really going on in the real world, you’d know that the real contempt here is the contempt John Boehner has for you tea baggers. You’d also know that Darrell Issa is a fuck up of George Bush proportions only worse. He’s a former suspected arsonist and has been accused of grand theft auto. He also tried to buy the governor’s office in California during the recall in 2003, only to break down sobbing like a little child in front of cameras when his fellow Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger moved in and “stole” the election from him — Schwarzenegger went on to become the worst governor in California history and one of the worst governors in U.S. history.

      You idiot fascists have been played for fools, and you don’t even know it.

  • jak
    July 2, 2012 - 12:09 pm | Permalink

    Who let madison out of its poo cage again? I think we should have it mop up it’s own delrious froth, but I think it would only throw the mop, shriek and then take a dump on the floor.
    …..poor mad, …sigh.

  • Richard Golden
    October 26, 2016 - 8:04 pm | Permalink
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *