Comments on: Was Cruella de Malkin Fired by Fox over Smear of 12 Year Old?

By: Bill Harmon

Bill Harmon — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:21:57 +0000

You people crack me up. Everyone has an opinion and most have a vote. This is one “Teabagger” really looking forward to the 2010 elections, Really.

By: freeman

freeman — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:56:14 +0000

so rivera would spit on her ….man that says it all …..what class….what we have come to expect from the challenged…God help us

By: H R Hobart

H R Hobart — Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:14:31 +0000

Been wondering where Michelle went,,,now I know why I hate riverra so much,,actually,,Michell is twice as tough as O Reilly,,,he is affraid of black ppl,,,her or Megan shud replace O Reilly,,he is a panty waist,,,,

By: Bina

Bina — Tue, 18 Mar 2008 03:02:25 +0000

Hey, Jim–you go first, you need it the worst. You Maglalang apologists need reminding that your unhinged little idol is in love with the concept of concentration camps for anyone deemed an Undesirable. That, by definition, IS totalitarian and fascist. (As is her notion that disabled 12-year-olds should be killed by lynch mobs of drooling freepers rather than being maintained by the state as Useless Eaters.)

By: Jim

Jim — Sun, 16 Mar 2008 16:06:52 +0000

Hey weefs
“I suspect itâ€™s because you people canâ€™t win on the merit of your real agenda: totalitarianism and fascism”

This is too funny. Go back to school, kid.

By: weefs

weefs — Sun, 16 Mar 2008 11:15:09 +0000

STFU howzee you coward shill. Malkin is a twat with an IQ in the negatives…which is probably why you like her. Why right-wingers are so prone to fear mongering and lies is beyond me. But I suspect it’s because you people can’t win on the merit of your real agenda: totalitarianism and fascism. Knock if off with the BC and JK bull. Stay in the here and now where your president and his gang of crooks are robbing us blind, murdering innocent people, waging a phony terror war, and architecting 911.
Where I come from (America) we call people like you traitors and hanging is too good for you.

By: HOWZEEE

HOWZEEE — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:06:37 +0000

MS MALKIN IS AN OUTSTANDING FINE PERSON,WELL INFORMED ,WITH HUGE COMMON SENSE WHICH VERY FEW FOLKS HAVE. O’RELLY HAS HAD SOME REAL STUPID OPINIONS BUT THIS IS HIS LOWEST SCREW UP. I WILL BE WATCHING MUCH LESS OF HIM FOR THIS STUPID DECISION. I JUST LEARNED OF HER FIRING AND WAS SHOCKED TO SEE THAT THE BEST SMARTEST VOICE ON TV WAS KICKED OFF TV ORELLY SHOW.
PS. GERALDO IS A COMPLETE SCHMUCK WITH NO COMMON SENSE AT ALL. I FEEL HE MUST BE ON SOME STUFF. ALSO OREILLY’S OPINION ON THE TRUTHFUL HONEST ACCURATE SWIFT BOAT SOLDIERS WAS VERY SAD. HE MISJUDGED THESE FINE MEN FOR SOME STRANGE REASON. JOHN KERRY SHOULD HAVE BEEN TRIED FOR TREASON DURING WAR TIME AND THEN FACED THE FIRING SQUAD BACK IN THE 70’s. IT SHOULD BE DONE NOW. THEN WE SHOULD DEAL WITH BILL AND HILLARY ON HIS GIVING RED CHINA OUR ARCH ENEMY TOP SECRET HELP WITH FIXING THE ACCURACY OFTHE MULTIPLE WARHEAD ICBM’s HE GAVE THEM IN 1992. I KNOW THAT MY FRIENDS FRIEND IS BERNARD SCHWARTZ.CEO OF LORAL AEROSPACE AND TOLD HIM THAT HE WAS ORDRED BY BILL C. TO GO BACK TO RED CHINA AND FIX THE GUIDED MISSLE NUKES WE GAVE THEM. SHAMEFUL….

By: Trish

Trish — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:13:12 +0000

His Nibbs can teach grammar on this site anytime.

By: His Nibbs

His Nibbs — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:58:00 +0000

Anonymous Coward wrote, “Why are the looneyâ€™s of the left sooooo vicious…”

Note to anonymous coward: learn grammar. “looneyâ€™s” with an apostrophe is POSSESSIVE, NOT PLURAL>

Examples:

“The Freeper looneyâ€™s gun jammed, backfiring and blowing off half of his face.”

In the above example, “looneyâ€™s” classifies the word “gun,” definitively indicating possession of the firearm.

“Right-wing looneys masturbate vigorously to mental images of Michelle Malkin.”

In the above example, “looneys” is a plural noun. Note, however, that it is incorrectly spelled — the proper singular spelling is “loony,’ and therefore the plural should follow the common modification of the “y” to “ie” in the plural, hence:

“Right-wing loonies masturbate vigorously to mental images of Michelle Malkin.”

And, for the record, we are hardly being vicious; rather, we are being realistic and rational about a deluded right-wing pundit with a penchant for harassing and stalking those she disagrees with; therefore, your assertion is not only based on false assumptions, i.e. people who disagree with the unctuous Maglalang are automatically left-wingers when in fact many in the center and even on the right are offended and disgusted by her conduct, and those on the left must all be insane when it is in fact the unhinged Ms. Maglalang whose actions suggest it is she who is in need of counseling or perhaps psychiatric intervention.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:35:44 +0000

Why are the looney’s of the left sooooo vicious-its like they are still in grade school on a maturity level on another note its always good for a couple of yucks
at their expense
michelle malkin is FFFFIIIINNNEEE!!!!
j chesley