The Clinton Haters — They’re Baaaaackk!

Remember Kathleen Willey, the woman who claimed in a deposition and “60 Minutes” that Pres. Clinton fondled her in a private study near the Oval Office, but whose credibility was later shredded by a friend to whom she confessed that she was lying?

Willey has a new book out in which she claims that Hillary Clinton put out a hit on two of Willey’s cats:

“A man, he was pretending to be a jogger, he came up to me and just asked did I ever find my cat?” Willey told the New York Sun, who also picked up the cat story Wednesday. “He mentioned my cat by name and [said], ‘Yeah, that Bullseye was a really nice cat.’” Willey told the Sun the abducted cat was part of an intimidation plan organized by the Clintons after she was called to testify in Paula Jones’ sexual harassment suit against the president.

“But it didn’t stop there,” said Fox News host Brian Kilmeade. “Does the name Fluffy mean anything to you? A year later she bought a cat, named it Fluffy. That cat ended up dead as well underneath the porch. She thinks somehow, and she claims somehow, the person who did this is linked back to Hillary.”

It turns out Willey did not dream this up all by herself:

Willey appears to found her accusations on the word of conservative talk show host Melanie Morgan, who says she had a conversation in which a private investigator named Jack Palladino all but admitted to being the culprit in the cat business. “The only regret that I had about the whole thing was that Hillary did not pay me in a timely fashion,” the P.I. allegedly said, according to Morgan’s account.

Wait. It gets better. Pallidino has denied that he ever he was paid by the Clintons to kill Willey’s cats:

But the online newspaper WorldNetDaily, which is affiliated with the publisher of Willey’s book, reported on Wednesday that Palladino denied those charges outright and is even threatening a libel lawsuit. “It’s total fantasy,” Palladino said.”No, that’s too kind; it’s a lie.”

Willey also recently claimed that her home was burglarized two months ago and that the only thing taken was the manuscript for her anti-Clinton book and her purse. Her computer was not taken, however, although she says it was tampered with.

Because we know that the book was published we can assume she composed it on her computer — as opposed to on an IBM Selectric or using a quill pen and ink — so the digital copy of the book was safe.

The inference here seems to be that the burglars were hired by the Clintons, but based on their inept performance I’d say they sound more like dumbasses typical of GOP undercover operations.