Comments on: In Debate, Neither Clinton Nor Obama Rule Out Unity Ticket http://www.pensitoreview.com/2008/01/31/in-debate-clinton-nor-obama-ruled-out-unity/ News and Opinion on Politics and Media Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:37:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Dipdive » Blog Archive » The Dream/Nightmare/Unity/Cold Fusion Ticket http://www.pensitoreview.com/2008/01/31/in-debate-clinton-nor-obama-ruled-out-unity/comment-page-1/#comment-522863 Dipdive » Blog Archive » The Dream/Nightmare/Unity/Cold Fusion Ticket Fri, 06 Jun 2008 18:49:43 +0000 http://www.pensitoreview.com/2008/01/31/in-debate-both-clinton-and-obama-agree-unity-ticket-is-possible/#comment-522863 [...] was suggested by Wolf Blitzer way back in January, and ever since has been argued about by bloggers, pundits, [...] [...] was suggested by Wolf Blitzer way back in January, and ever since has been argued about by bloggers, pundits, [...]

]]> By: Election 2008: Candidates « Hope2012 http://www.pensitoreview.com/2008/01/31/in-debate-clinton-nor-obama-ruled-out-unity/comment-page-1/#comment-457391 Election 2008: Candidates « Hope2012 Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:04:19 +0000 http://www.pensitoreview.com/2008/01/31/in-debate-both-clinton-and-obama-agree-unity-ticket-is-possible/#comment-457391 [...] Obama and Clinton refuse to rule out Obama/Clinton or Clinton/Obama ticket (Pensito Review 1/31/08) [...] [...] Obama and Clinton refuse to rule out Obama/Clinton or Clinton/Obama ticket (Pensito Review 1/31/08) [...]

]]> By: Frank Hansen http://www.pensitoreview.com/2008/01/31/in-debate-clinton-nor-obama-ruled-out-unity/comment-page-1/#comment-455348 Frank Hansen Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:13:55 +0000 http://www.pensitoreview.com/2008/01/31/in-debate-both-clinton-and-obama-agree-unity-ticket-is-possible/#comment-455348 Living abroad outside the US, you have other agendas. 1, Energy ressources in the future? 2, What would be the neccesary new roll in UN for the US? The world needs for US to work for reestablishing and strenthening the mandate back into the UN. What is the roll for the US to reestablish the mandate back into the position and work under UN. To elliminate national interest that keeps setting back the work of the UN, could freshen up the global believe in peace, which is needed, notjust to focus on teh US war in IRAK, that is giving energy to something that dominates the picture from where US stand, but the rest of the world has wars every day. All is about the USA, meanwhile thousands have needs, that could be helped by supporting the UN with money and efforts, a declared work from more than 150 countries. There are global issues in priority more than national, - now. If you want to be the face of attraction, make it look authentic and live your talk, be democratic. If veto should continue to be happening the signal would be: "my vote means more than yours" it will announce that boys in the class can have it their way. The argument for a continious VETO is from the 2. world war. Start a new, let the values of equality - ring true, let go of fear and let us start supporting the way for peace and brotherhood of man. Generations of chirldren have never had a life with out warfare of some kind. Do not let personal issues of power structure destroy the global issues, it´s getting late, unite for good in action. What would be the new roll for USA in the UN is my question, and if corruption is detected, what is better than to do something about it from the inside and pay the bill equal to what others do, waiting for the US to have the time to invest in progress. The United Nations work is established on values that should be the possible way for all to follow, because the values has no threat, has no violence. Dont leave or give up UN, as it was close at the beginning of the IRAK war. Where Bush determined that corruption was not worth investing in looking at the UN, if USA dont have confidence in the UN work better for change on the inside than critizing and instead go out for manifesting own interest on the outside. UN is the hope for all, not USA alone, here is a conflict a worldconflict in having confidence, - wonder why? Go for unison, one with another, determined into the one way of brotherhodd. Politics is not the answer, I am sorry. Frank Hansen Living abroad outside the US, you have other agendas.
1, Energy ressources in the future?
2, What would be the neccesary new roll in UN for the US?

The world needs for US to work for reestablishing and strenthening the mandate back into the UN.

What is the roll for the US to reestablish the mandate back into the position and work under UN.

To elliminate national interest that keeps setting back the work of the UN, could freshen up the global believe in peace, which is needed, notjust to focus on teh US war in IRAK, that is giving energy to something that dominates the picture from where US stand, but the rest of the world has wars every day.
All is about the USA, meanwhile thousands have needs, that could be helped by supporting the UN with money and efforts, a declared work from more than 150 countries.

There are global issues in priority more than national, – now. If you want to be the face of attraction, make it look authentic and live your talk, be democratic.

If veto should continue to be happening the signal would be: “my vote means more than yours” it will announce that boys in the class can have it their way.

The argument for a continious VETO is from the 2. world war. Start a new, let the values of equality – ring true, let go of fear and let us start supporting the way for peace and brotherhood of man.

Generations of chirldren have never had a life with out warfare of some kind. Do not let personal issues of power structure destroy the global issues, it´s getting late, unite for good in action.

What would be the new roll for USA in the UN is my question, and if corruption is detected, what is better than to do something about it from the inside and pay the bill equal to what others do, waiting for the US to have the time to invest in progress.

The United Nations work is established on values that should be the possible way for all to follow, because the values has no threat, has no violence.

Dont leave or give up UN, as it was close at the beginning of the IRAK war. Where Bush determined that corruption was not worth investing in looking at the UN, if USA dont have confidence in the UN work better for change on the inside than critizing and instead go out for manifesting own interest on the outside. UN is the hope for all, not USA alone, here is a conflict a worldconflict in having confidence, – wonder why? Go for unison, one with another, determined into the one way of brotherhodd. Politics is not the answer, I am sorry. Frank Hansen

]]>