In the Democratic candidates’ debate last night, the “liberal media” teamed up with fake media when ABC News moderator George Stephanopoulos asked Barack Obama about Obama’s connection to the former 1960s radical, William Ayres. Here’s a sketch of the exchange between Stephanopoulos and Fox News’ Sean Hannity, on Hannity’s radio show on WABC:
When Hannity asked about the first question below about Ayers and whether George had plans to ask such a question, George replied, “Well, I’m taking notes now Sean.” It did actually sound like he was pausing to take notes.
George Stephanopoulos was just on the Sean Hannity Radio show getting all chummy with Hannity. George told Hannity that Hannity was “absolutely right” that Obama has tarnished his image as a uniter when he “pandered to the elite San Francisco crowd about the blue collar Pennsylvania workers” (summation of George’s comments, not an exact quote, but close).
Hannity asked George what kinds of questions they’ll be asking at the debate tomorrow and they discussed a few things. When Hannity asked about the first question below about Ayers and whether George had plans to ask such a question, George replied, “Well, I’m taking notes now Sean.” It did actually sound like he was pausing to take notes. And Hannity continued to feed him more:
1) Ask Obama about his relationship with Ayers and WeatherUnderground and Axelrod’s comments, “They’re friendly”
2) Ask Obama why he attended the Million Man March
Here’s the Q&A from the debate:
MR. STEPHANOPOULOS: [On] the general theme of patriotism in your relationships. A gentleman named William Ayers, he was part of the Weather Underground in the 1970s. They bombed the Pentagon, the Capitol and other buildings. He’s never apologized for that. And in fact, on 9/11 he was quoted in The New York Times saying, “I don’t regret setting bombs; I feel we didn’t do enough.”
An early organizing meeting for your state senate campaign was held at his house, and your campaign has said you are friendly. Can you explain that relationship for the voters, and explain to Democrats why it won’t be a problem?
SEN. OBAMA: George, but this is an example of what I’m talking about.
This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who’s a professor of English in Chicago, who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. He’s not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis.
And the notion that somehow as a consequence of me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago when I was 8 years old, somehow reflects on me and my values, doesn’t make much sense, George.
The fact is, is that I’m also friendly with Tom Coburn, one of the most conservative Republicans in the United States Senate, who during his campaign once said that it might be appropriate to apply the death penalty to those who carried out abortions.
Do I need to apologize for Mr. Coburn’s statements? Because I certainly don’t agree with those either.
So this kind of game, in which anybody who I know, regardless of how flimsy the relationship is, is somehow — somehow their ideas could be attributed to me — I think the American people are smarter than that. They’re not going to suggest somehow that that is reflective of my views, because it obviously isn’t.
SEN. CLINTON: Well, I think that is a fair general statement, but I also believe that Senator Obama served on a board with Mr. Ayers for a period of time, the Woods Foundation, which was a paid directorship position.
On March 10, after hearing Sean Hannity do a long segment on Obama’s purported relationship with William Ayres, we did a little research on the Intertubes and published this story, “Swiftboating Obama: A Look Inside Bogus Rightwing Claims He Has Terror Ties.” In a nutshell, their “relationship” was pretty simple: Ayres was a constituent in the state senate district Obama represented, and they coincidentally served on a foundation board together.
As the anti-Fox site Newshounds pointed out, Hannity has a much friendlier relationship to a rightwing terrorist than Obama does to Ayers:
If Obama’s relationship with Ayers is so significant, Stephanopoulos should also ask Hannity about HIS relationship with Neo-Nazi/white supremacist Hal Turner.
Unlike Obama’s insubstantial tie to Ayers, Hannity’s relationship to Turner had real substance. Turner was invited to the set of Hannity & Colmes, the two men spoke off the air and Turner had the “back door” phone number to the studio at WABC.
If you want to complain about Stephanopoulos’ using Hannity’s trumped up line of attack, this DailyKos diarist has a long list of contact numbers at ABC News.




I wouldn’t vote Hillary dog catcher now.
That wasn’t a debate last night, it was a disgrace taken from a pile of shit. Nothing was mentioned about Hillary’s mental problems and her pathological lies which pour out of her mouth daily. Or how about the Clinton Body Count list. These people don’t want real change because it would mean a lot of changes for them if an honest person would be elected president. It would mean the end of a free ride for a lot of the lousy crooks and corruption in our government.
abc = The Abortion broadcast Company
Hmmm… what else did that filthy little ferret Stephanopoulos do with/to hannity ?
Hillary should have simply denounced Stephanopolous’ shameful behavior. Instead, she tried to pile on.
I’m done with her.
Wonderful facts about how republican smear tactics were used by Charles and George. I have always known that George stepawhatever was a republican smearer. Just turns out so is Charles.