Sarah Palin was elected governor of Alaska by touting her experience as an ethics reformer. Yesterday, however, a panel composed of eight Republican and four Democratic Alaska legislators voted unanimously to approve a finding citing Palin for abuse of power:
Governor Palin knowingly permitted a situation to continue where impermissible pressure was placed on several subordinates in order to advance a personal agenda,
[Palin] abused her power in pushing for the firing of a state trooper once married to her sister and by allowing her husband to use the governor’s office in a crusade against the officer, a legislative investigation found.
“Governor Palin knowingly permitted a situation to continue where impermissible pressure was placed on several subordinates in order to advance a personal agenda, to wit: to get Trooper Michael Wooten fired,” concluded investigator Steve Branchflower in his report made public Friday.
The governor let her husband, Todd, use the governor’s office and its resources, “including access to state employees, to continue to contact subordinate state employees in an effort to find some way to get Trooper Wooten fired,” Branchflower wrote.
“She had the authority and power to require Mr. Palin to cease contacting subordinates, but she failed to act,” he wrote.
This created conflicts of interests for the state employees Todd Palin was contacting. “They must choose to either please a superior or run the risk of facing that superior’s displeasure and the possible consequences of such displeasure. This was one of the very reasons the Ethics Act was promulgated by the Legislature,” Branchflower wrote.
Palin also made several inquiries herself about why Wooten remained on the job shortly after she became governor, Branchflower said.
Republicans on the panel gave Palin cover in two ways. Although the report clearly states Palin abused power, it also says she legally had the right to Public Safety Commissioner Walter Monegan, despite the fact that she improperly failed to stop her cronies from illegally pressuring Monegan to fire Wooten. This contradiction gives the McCain campaign cover to say that Palin was exonerrated by the panel, even though the report says her actions were improper.
Secondly, the panel delayed approving the report until late Friday evening, well past the East Coast news cycle. The delay was apparently an attempt to tamp down news coverage of the story.
The delay has apparently worked. While most daily newspapers reported the results of the investigation on their front pages, the story was not leading the news cycles on CNN or MSNBC early Saturday morning, and there has been scant mention of it, if any, on Fox News.




Wonder who built the Palin’s new house, at around the time the new sports complex was built. Todd says he and some friends!!!!
Undeclared registered voter here. Let’s see: Judicial Council of mostly REPUBLICANS started investigation BEFORE McCain picked her and she agreed to it…”hold me accountable”…she said, then McCain picked her and immediately it became a Partisan witch hunt, cooperation stopped, stonewalling began, suits to suppress were filed but were rejected by REPUBLICAN judges, then report was reviewed by 8 REPUBLICANS and 4 Democrats…and the vote was UNANIMOUS 12-0 to accept the conclusion that Sarah Palin abused her power as Governor to try to get Wooten fired…a violation of Alaska ethics law…use of Governor’s Office to settle personal vendetta. In what political universe is it deemed that an investigation sanctioned by a mostly REPUBLICAN panel, ruled valid by REPUBLICAN judges, and approved as valid by 8 REPUBLICANS and only 4 Democrats is considered a biased investigation against a Republican? If that is your universe then I am afraid you are seriously delusional. As for the trooper needing to be fired. He went through the disciplinary process and was held accountable and disciplined way before Palin became governor. Case closed. No one is entitled to come along later and re-open a case just because they didn’t like the result. New cause of action is needed and only the new cause of action should be considered not just go back to dirt from years back and already considered. You would want that if it was your job being reviewed and so would I. By the way, I am still voting for McCain even though he is a serial liar and Palin is the most dangerous thing that could happen to our country. Why? First, I will not ever vote for a black man in the White House. More importantly, I believe our country is now just too rotten to the core and absolutely needs to be destroyed for the good of the world. McCain/Palin are perfect to complete the job. Besides, I am not worried…the Rapture will prevent me from suffering any of the destruction.
You’ve been skipping your meds again, haven’t you, Paul?
Did Paul ever start them?
I think Paul was being ironic.