Congress, News, Racism
As usual, The Miami Herald’s Leonard Pitts Jr. nailed it in his commentary on the intolerance blacks showed in their opposition to gay marriage in last week’s elections:
Sometimes, progress carries an asterisk.
That’s as good a summary as any of a sad irony from last week’s historic election. You will recall one of the major storylines of that day was the fact that, in helping make Barack Obama the nation’s first black president, African Americans struck a blow against a history that has taught us all too well how it feels to be demeaned and denied. Unfortunately, while they were striking that blow, some black folks chose to demean and deny someone else.
Gay people, like black people, know what it’s like to be left out, lied about, scapegoated, discriminated against, held up, beat down, denied a job, a loan or a life
Last week, you see, California voters passed an initiative denying recognition to same-sex marriages. This overturned an earlier ruling from the state Supreme Court legalizing those unions. The vote was hardly a surprise; surely there is nothing in politics easier than to rouse a majority of voters against the ”threat” of gay people being treated like people.
But African Americans were crucial to the passage of the bill, supporting it by a margin of better than two to one. To anyone familiar with the deep strain of social conservatism that runs through the black electorate, this is not surprising either. It is, however, starkly disappointing. Moreover, it leaves me wondering for the umpteenth time how people who have known so much of oppression can turn around and oppress.
Yes, I know. I can hear some black folk yelling at me from here, wanting me to know it’s not the same, what gays have gone through and what black people did, wanting me to know they acted from sound principles and strong values. It is justification and rationalization, and I’ve heard it all before. I wish they would explain to me how they can, with a straight face, use arguments against gay people that were first tested and perfected against us.
When, for instance, they use an obscure passage from the Bible to claim God has ordained the mistreatment of gays, don’t they hear an echo of white people using that Bible to claim God ordained the mistreatment of blacks?
When they rail against homosexuality as ”unnatural,” don’t they remember when that word was used to describe abolition, interracial marriage and school integration?
When they say they’d have no trouble with gay people if they would just stop ”flaunting” their sexuality, doesn’t it bring to mind all those good ol’ boys who said they had no problem with ”Nigras” so long as they stayed in their place?
No, the black experience and the gay experience are not equivalent. Gay people were not the victims of mass kidnap or mass enslavement.
No war was required to strike the shackles from their limbs.
But that’s not the same as saying blacks and gays have nothing in common. On the contrary, gay people, like black people, know what it’s like to be left out, lied about, scapegoated, discriminated against, held up, beat down, denied a job, a loan or a life. And, too, they know how it feels to sit there and watch other people vote upon your very humanity, just as if those other people had a right. So beg pardon, but black people should know better. I feel the same when Jews are racist, or gays anti-Semitic. Those who bear scars from intolerance should be the last to practice it.
Sadly, we are sometimes the first. That tells you something about how seductive a thing intolerance is, how difficult it can be to resist the serpent whisper that says it’s OK to ridicule and marginalize those people over there because they look funny, or talk funny, worship funny or love funny. So in the end, we struggle with the same imperative as from ages ago: to overcome the crippling legacy of bigotry and injustice. But if last week’s vote taught us nothing else, it taught us that persistence plus faith equals change.
And we shall overcome.




Is it true that the African Americans are anti gay marriage? Or are people basing this on the way the votes look … ?
A lot of people may have misunderstood the way the proposition was worded and actually voted against their actual choice.
And, I caution everyone not to make blanket judgments based on votes cast on unauditable voting machines. Lots of mysterious anomalies are cropping up all over the country.
Something interesting – who was behind putting Prop 8 on the ballot?
“Max Blumental reports that the two biggest individual backers of Proposition 8 in CA are the mother of Blackwater founder Erik Prince and Howard Ahmanson.
We all know Blackwater, but Ahmanson has two claims to fame. He was the main financier of election machine company ES&S” …
More:
Proposition 8
I do not understand why the rights of some of this state’s citizens was placed on a ballot for people to vote their prejudices. When given the opportunity, people will vote their prejudices, pure and simple. Looking at the Prop and how it was written — which was sooo confusing — and the idea that a Proposition was used to change the state’s Constitution to deny rights to some of its tax paying citizens represented, IMHO, a “Fail Whale†from the start. Basically, it was destined to pass, it did, no surprise there.
Before I launch into my rant and rage against the machine let me first state I am an African American lesbian, homeowner, and one who voted “No on 8.†I felt stupid voting on something so ridiculous but I did and that’s that. However, I do know a lesbian couple who missed the point altogether by voting “Yes on 8″ because they did not quite understand Yes meant No and No meant Yes. I am a firm believer where there is one, there are others. This lesbian interracial couple are two smart women with advanced degrees but they found the wording of the Prop — confusing.
Not through yet …
Facts Belie the Scapegoating of Black People for Proposition 8
Keep it coming, Kira. I’m working on a story about Ahmanson. Thanks for the tip. I moved all my accounts from Home Savings about 15 years ago when I first learned about this homophobic nutcase. He is a follower of RJ Rushdoony, who advocates death by stoning for gays, adulterers and others.
Well, now that you’re on the case, Jon, I doubt I’ll find anything you haven’t dug up from teh Google.
Blumenthal’s article is very in-depth.
Just for laffs [ironic as it is]:
Still Wanna Quote Leviticus to Say Being Gay is Wrong?
Ok, here’s one for the refresher course on connections:
Diebold, Electronic Voting and the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy by Bob Fitrakis in 2004. [Some info on Ahmanson]
Actually the serpent’s whisper is saying, ‘Ignore that fire out of heaven raining down on Sodom and Gomorrah thing’.