Comments on: O’Reilly’s Claim of Ratings Record Is Shown to Be Laughably False

By: Jon

Jon — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:43:37 +0000

Amazed, Charles? Books have been written about O’Reilly’s incessant lying. Fox will always have bigger ratings than real news channels because it is not a news channel. It’s one big infotainment, product-placement channel for the right wing. On that level, it competes with wrestling — and in that match-up it trails badly.

By: Charles Green

Charles Green — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:30:17 +0000

It is amazing to me that that Jon Ponder and Keith Olbermann are attacking O’Reilly so aggressively on this topic. The headline here indicates that Ponder considers this an important event. In the transcript, O’Reilly is clearly quoted as having made his comment based on assumption. He clearly said “I don’t think” as a qualifier to his statements. That being said, it is even more laughable that Olbermann would attempt to insult or question O’Reilly’s ratings. The last time I checked, 100 months at #1 is more than 0 months at #1, which is the success Olbermann has acheived. O’Reilly has never lost in the ratings to Olbermann. When he beats O’Reilly he should start bragging. Until then, his ratings are the laughable element in the conversation.

By: Nikolai

Nikolai — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:57:59 +0000

BILL O’REILLY and his CANned statements hint at SUCcess, but still, it’s a MYstery that he has an audience at all, the little DICKens.

By: One Penny Sheet » O’Reilly’s Claim of Ratings Record Is Shown to Be Laughably False

Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:23:17 +0000

[...] via Pensito Review » O’Reilly’s Claim of Ratings Record Is Shown to Be Laughably False. [...]