<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gay Marriage Has Twice the Support Today That Interracial Marriage Had When It Was Legalized in the 1960s (Updated)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-double-approval-of-mixed-marriage-in-1968/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-double-approval-of-mixed-marriage-in-1968/</link>
	<description>News and Opinion on Politics and Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:12:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trish Ponder</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-double-approval-of-mixed-marriage-in-1968/comment-page-1/#comment-705780</link>
		<dc:creator>Trish Ponder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 23:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-today-is-nearly-double-approval-of-interracial-marriage-when-it-became-legal/#comment-705780</guid>
		<description>Actually, Jon, you just described Afghanistan. Only it&#039;s even worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Jon, you just described Afghanistan. Only it&#8217;s even worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-double-approval-of-mixed-marriage-in-1968/comment-page-1/#comment-705776</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-today-is-nearly-double-approval-of-interracial-marriage-when-it-became-legal/#comment-705776</guid>
		<description>Clara, if we&#039;re going to base our laws today on the standards of nomadic desert tribes 5,000 years ago then it will be legal for men to have multiple wives and to own slaves and illegal for women to work, own property or make a move without the permission of the top male in their families. 

I know that sounds like an ideal world to right-wing religious nuts and Tea Baggers, but normal people want to live in a world that reflects the progress we&#039;ve made as a society over the past 50 centuries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clara, if we&#8217;re going to base our laws today on the standards of nomadic desert tribes 5,000 years ago then it will be legal for men to have multiple wives and to own slaves and illegal for women to work, own property or make a move without the permission of the top male in their families. </p>
<p>I know that sounds like an ideal world to right-wing religious nuts and Tea Baggers, but normal people want to live in a world that reflects the progress we&#8217;ve made as a society over the past 50 centuries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clara</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-double-approval-of-mixed-marriage-in-1968/comment-page-1/#comment-705749</link>
		<dc:creator>clara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-today-is-nearly-double-approval-of-interracial-marriage-when-it-became-legal/#comment-705749</guid>
		<description>Did marry men or women marry women 5000 years ago? Was there a time in society when they did on a regular basis and such couples were fully accepted in the society at that time?
Just asking because I didn&#039;t know that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did marry men or women marry women 5000 years ago? Was there a time in society when they did on a regular basis and such couples were fully accepted in the society at that time?<br />
Just asking because I didn&#8217;t know that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Punjabee-anne</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-double-approval-of-mixed-marriage-in-1968/comment-page-1/#comment-705748</link>
		<dc:creator>Punjabee-anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-today-is-nearly-double-approval-of-interracial-marriage-when-it-became-legal/#comment-705748</guid>
		<description>No one can tell that a person is gay by looking at them!

There is still a lot of hostility toward blacks in America because, unfortunately, skin color cannot be changed. Someone who sees a black male, for example, instantly has preconceived notions about blacks mostly due to negative press. Too often black men are still seen as shiftless, lazy, unintelligent gangsters or thugs. Black women are either viewed as abusive welfare queens sucking the &quot;system&quot; dry with their myriads of kids, whores, or angry, higher-than-thou b***ches with attitudes. These stereotypes have persisted despite all the hype about diversity. America is STILL a racist country and blacks and people of color are STILL at the bottom of the socio-economic ladder across every spectrum.
America may finally be warming up to the idea that gays are people of worth and value and should be accorded all rights due them. This country would be truly ideal if, in the words of Dr. Martin Luther King, all people were &quot;judged by the content of their character&quot; and not by their skin color or sexual orientation.

Just my 2¢, for what it&#039;s worth...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one can tell that a person is gay by looking at them!</p>
<p>There is still a lot of hostility toward blacks in America because, unfortunately, skin color cannot be changed. Someone who sees a black male, for example, instantly has preconceived notions about blacks mostly due to negative press. Too often black men are still seen as shiftless, lazy, unintelligent gangsters or thugs. Black women are either viewed as abusive welfare queens sucking the &#8220;system&#8221; dry with their myriads of kids, whores, or angry, higher-than-thou b***ches with attitudes. These stereotypes have persisted despite all the hype about diversity. America is STILL a racist country and blacks and people of color are STILL at the bottom of the socio-economic ladder across every spectrum.<br />
America may finally be warming up to the idea that gays are people of worth and value and should be accorded all rights due them. This country would be truly ideal if, in the words of Dr. Martin Luther King, all people were &#8220;judged by the content of their character&#8221; and not by their skin color or sexual orientation.</p>
<p>Just my 2¢, for what it&#8217;s worth&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emi</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-double-approval-of-mixed-marriage-in-1968/comment-page-1/#comment-705286</link>
		<dc:creator>Emi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-today-is-nearly-double-approval-of-interracial-marriage-when-it-became-legal/#comment-705286</guid>
		<description>Sorry that was unclear. This is the link:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/oct/16/mixed-race-couple-marriage-licence</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry that was unclear. This is the link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/oct/16/mixed-race-couple-marriage-licence" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/oct/16/mixed-race-couple-marriage-licence</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emi</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-double-approval-of-mixed-marriage-in-1968/comment-page-1/#comment-705285</link>
		<dc:creator>Emi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-today-is-nearly-double-approval-of-interracial-marriage-when-it-became-legal/#comment-705285</guid>
		<description>See the above link to an article today about the Louisiana bigot who has been refusing to marry mixed race couples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See the above link to an article today about the Louisiana bigot who has been refusing to marry mixed race couples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: athensguy</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-double-approval-of-mixed-marriage-in-1968/comment-page-1/#comment-705271</link>
		<dc:creator>athensguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-today-is-nearly-double-approval-of-interracial-marriage-when-it-became-legal/#comment-705271</guid>
		<description>Mayor McCheese, the conservatives are working on removing the &quot;liberal&quot; influence on the bible.  Apparently being nice wasn&#039;t the original intent of Jesus.  He really came to kill blacks and gays.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project

I like this article.  Whenever some idiot says something anti-gay I like to bring up how my marriage might not have been legal in GA a little over 40 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mayor McCheese, the conservatives are working on removing the &#8220;liberal&#8221; influence on the bible.  Apparently being nice wasn&#8217;t the original intent of Jesus.  He really came to kill blacks and gays.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project" rel="nofollow">http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project</a></p>
<p>I like this article.  Whenever some idiot says something anti-gay I like to bring up how my marriage might not have been legal in GA a little over 40 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayor McCheese</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-double-approval-of-mixed-marriage-in-1968/comment-page-1/#comment-705233</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayor McCheese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 17:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-today-is-nearly-double-approval-of-interracial-marriage-when-it-became-legal/#comment-705233</guid>
		<description>The only reason government is involved in marriage of any kind is because people receive tax benefits when they are married. Not because you like men or women. Get over yourselves, seriously.  The real culprits of anti-gay marriage sentiments are those who spuriously claim religious and moral authority over other people. It is certainly more terrible to be at the mercy of one group&#039;s insidious, self-perceived superiority than to be held to laws that can be debated and changed.  Nothing will change the sentiments in that two thousand year old book unless a council amends the &quot;word of God&quot; again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason government is involved in marriage of any kind is because people receive tax benefits when they are married. Not because you like men or women. Get over yourselves, seriously.  The real culprits of anti-gay marriage sentiments are those who spuriously claim religious and moral authority over other people. It is certainly more terrible to be at the mercy of one group&#8217;s insidious, self-perceived superiority than to be held to laws that can be debated and changed.  Nothing will change the sentiments in that two thousand year old book unless a council amends the &#8220;word of God&#8221; again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-double-approval-of-mixed-marriage-in-1968/comment-page-1/#comment-705211</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 03:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-today-is-nearly-double-approval-of-interracial-marriage-when-it-became-legal/#comment-705211</guid>
		<description>- The fact that 49 percent of Americans claim to know someone who is gay also appears to belie anti-gay activists’ assertion that only 1 or 2 percent of the population is gay. By comparison, about 1.5 percent of the country are Mormons, but it seems unlikely that half of Americans would say they personally know someone who is a Mormon. For example, I don’t. -

That&#039;s because Mormon&#039;s aren&#039;t as equally spread out across America (mostly centred in Utah) as homosexuals, therefore there isn&#039;t an equal chance for people of other orientations to get to know them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- The fact that 49 percent of Americans claim to know someone who is gay also appears to belie anti-gay activists’ assertion that only 1 or 2 percent of the population is gay. By comparison, about 1.5 percent of the country are Mormons, but it seems unlikely that half of Americans would say they personally know someone who is a Mormon. For example, I don’t. -</p>
<p>That&#8217;s because Mormon&#8217;s aren&#8217;t as equally spread out across America (mostly centred in Utah) as homosexuals, therefore there isn&#8217;t an equal chance for people of other orientations to get to know them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Old Rubberlegs</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-double-approval-of-mixed-marriage-in-1968/comment-page-1/#comment-705210</link>
		<dc:creator>Old Rubberlegs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/05/08/gay-marriage-support-today-is-nearly-double-approval-of-interracial-marriage-when-it-became-legal/#comment-705210</guid>
		<description>randal, was that addressed to me? If so, let me explain this more slowly (Actually, I&#039;ll just ask that you read more slowly. Same affect.)

Governments shouldn&#039;t be granting or be involved with ANY kind of marriage. Marriage should be a contract between or among two or more consenting individuals. If they want to involve the church or the Masons or a goat, that&#039;s up to them (and the goat).

The problem is that governments have been using things like marriage licenses to shape human behavior and pander to it&#039;s dumbest constituents (for example people who hold any kind of religious belief whatsoever) ever since the first Neanderthal neighborhood association. Want this tax break? Gotta&#039; be married. Want a judge to grant you custody of a child when your partner dies? Better be married. And on and on.

What about all of the other thousands of contracts you involve yourself with in your lifetime? Why shouldn&#039;t they be on record in your state capitol. For that matter, why just state governments? Should your car lease be approved by your county, state or federal government? Why not the United Nations? Why not all of the above? What&#039;s so special about marriage (other than that it&#039;s a convenient way to coerce people.)

And not to get all Carl Sagan on you, but there&#039;s probably an even bigger government out there somewhere that has a way to approve your marriage. Keep in mind though, they might have more than just two measly genders. Are you sure your marriage is legal on Zebulon-Pike?

Sorry to be all radical. I&#039;d just like to be able to go through life with fewer permission slips from the Great Hall Monitor.

And would you believe that my spouse and I are of different races. It&#039;s true. You can continue to pin &quot;RACIST&quot; on me, if you like. And, hey, if you count &quot;stupid&quot; as a race, I&#039;m about as smart-power as they get. (&quot;They keep lettin&#039; them Idiotos in frum Dumbfukistan, takin&#039; all our GOOD jobs. An&#039; thuh pres-ee-dent, he a ain&#039;t nuthin&#039; but gal-dern Stupidito...&quot;, etc and so forth.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>randal, was that addressed to me? If so, let me explain this more slowly (Actually, I&#8217;ll just ask that you read more slowly. Same affect.)</p>
<p>Governments shouldn&#8217;t be granting or be involved with ANY kind of marriage. Marriage should be a contract between or among two or more consenting individuals. If they want to involve the church or the Masons or a goat, that&#8217;s up to them (and the goat).</p>
<p>The problem is that governments have been using things like marriage licenses to shape human behavior and pander to it&#8217;s dumbest constituents (for example people who hold any kind of religious belief whatsoever) ever since the first Neanderthal neighborhood association. Want this tax break? Gotta&#8217; be married. Want a judge to grant you custody of a child when your partner dies? Better be married. And on and on.</p>
<p>What about all of the other thousands of contracts you involve yourself with in your lifetime? Why shouldn&#8217;t they be on record in your state capitol. For that matter, why just state governments? Should your car lease be approved by your county, state or federal government? Why not the United Nations? Why not all of the above? What&#8217;s so special about marriage (other than that it&#8217;s a convenient way to coerce people.)</p>
<p>And not to get all Carl Sagan on you, but there&#8217;s probably an even bigger government out there somewhere that has a way to approve your marriage. Keep in mind though, they might have more than just two measly genders. Are you sure your marriage is legal on Zebulon-Pike?</p>
<p>Sorry to be all radical. I&#8217;d just like to be able to go through life with fewer permission slips from the Great Hall Monitor.</p>
<p>And would you believe that my spouse and I are of different races. It&#8217;s true. You can continue to pin &#8220;RACIST&#8221; on me, if you like. And, hey, if you count &#8220;stupid&#8221; as a race, I&#8217;m about as smart-power as they get. (&#8221;They keep lettin&#8217; them Idiotos in frum Dumbfukistan, takin&#8217; all our GOOD jobs. An&#8217; thuh pres-ee-dent, he a ain&#8217;t nuthin&#8217; but gal-dern Stupidito&#8230;&#8221;, etc and so forth.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

