<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leader of Anti-Govt. Group Funding Glenn Beck&#8217;s 9/12 March Is a Christ-Denying Atheist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/09/12/leader-of-912-march-sponsor-is-a-christ-deying-atheist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/09/12/leader-of-912-march-sponsor-is-a-christ-deying-atheist/</link>
	<description>News and Opinion on Politics and Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:12:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Madison</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/09/12/leader-of-912-march-sponsor-is-a-christ-deying-atheist/comment-page-1/#comment-709844</link>
		<dc:creator>Madison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 03:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/?p=9325#comment-709844</guid>
		<description>As great as I&#039;m sure you are, your influence in the Republican Party is, respectfully, less than zero. I stand by my statement that no Republicans with stature or even skin in the game ever called on Bush and Cheney to resign for the good of the party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As great as I&#8217;m sure you are, your influence in the Republican Party is, respectfully, less than zero. I stand by my statement that no Republicans with stature or even skin in the game ever called on Bush and Cheney to resign for the good of the party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Parris</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/09/12/leader-of-912-march-sponsor-is-a-christ-deying-atheist/comment-page-1/#comment-709834</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Parris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 23:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/?p=9325#comment-709834</guid>
		<description>&quot;Madison&quot; wrote:
&quot;It is patently false that Republicans and conservatives stood up to the Bush-Cheney machine. We were all paying very close attention during the whole eight years, and that simply didn’t happen.&quot; 

The following article, one of numerous on www.TheReaganWing.com, that do the same thing, proves the above statement to be exactly what I claimed, a lie:
http://thereaganwing.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/best-of-07-series-dana-carvey-found/
In it we both seriously criticize and mercilessly ridicule the Bush Administration.
In our &quot;about us&quot; page, posted since our founding in 1984, we made this contrast with Reagan: 
&quot;For eight years I had kept pinching myself that a real conservative actually was President of the United States. For there was never any question he was genuine. His successors as Republican Party Presidential nominees, the winners, the losers, – all of them, in fact, carried conservative themes (like luggage), but mixed them on the same loading platform among packages stuffed with Liberalism Lite (less filling, sounds great). When the Bushes said “kinder,” “gentler,” and “compassionate” what they actually meant, it is now clear, was “very expensive” and “seriously expanding the role of government.” And Bob Dole campaigned on an unmistakable erosion of the Tenth Amendment as his greatest achievement. Reagan was the opposite. Even when he erred in policy, we could trust his intentions. In 1982, He agreed with the Democrat Congress to raise taxes, but only because he had acquired their promise to make $3 of spending cuts for every $1 of tax increase. That he believed them is testimony to an optimism and faith in the good will of Americans that far exceeds my own. Of course he never got one penny of their promise.&quot; 
I could fill many pages with specific refutations of the leftist dogma that the Bush admin. &quot;got no opposition&quot; from actual conservatives. But what would it matter? The truth is obviously of no concern, here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Madison&#8221; wrote:<br />
&#8220;It is patently false that Republicans and conservatives stood up to the Bush-Cheney machine. We were all paying very close attention during the whole eight years, and that simply didn’t happen.&#8221; </p>
<p>The following article, one of numerous on <a href="http://www.TheReaganWing.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.TheReaganWing.com</a>, that do the same thing, proves the above statement to be exactly what I claimed, a lie:<br />
<a href="http://thereaganwing.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/best-of-07-series-dana-carvey-found/" rel="nofollow">http://thereaganwing.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/best-of-07-series-dana-carvey-found/</a><br />
In it we both seriously criticize and mercilessly ridicule the Bush Administration.<br />
In our &#8220;about us&#8221; page, posted since our founding in 1984, we made this contrast with Reagan:<br />
&#8220;For eight years I had kept pinching myself that a real conservative actually was President of the United States. For there was never any question he was genuine. His successors as Republican Party Presidential nominees, the winners, the losers, – all of them, in fact, carried conservative themes (like luggage), but mixed them on the same loading platform among packages stuffed with Liberalism Lite (less filling, sounds great). When the Bushes said “kinder,” “gentler,” and “compassionate” what they actually meant, it is now clear, was “very expensive” and “seriously expanding the role of government.” And Bob Dole campaigned on an unmistakable erosion of the Tenth Amendment as his greatest achievement. Reagan was the opposite. Even when he erred in policy, we could trust his intentions. In 1982, He agreed with the Democrat Congress to raise taxes, but only because he had acquired their promise to make $3 of spending cuts for every $1 of tax increase. That he believed them is testimony to an optimism and faith in the good will of Americans that far exceeds my own. Of course he never got one penny of their promise.&#8221;<br />
I could fill many pages with specific refutations of the leftist dogma that the Bush admin. &#8220;got no opposition&#8221; from actual conservatives. But what would it matter? The truth is obviously of no concern, here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madison</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/09/12/leader-of-912-march-sponsor-is-a-christ-deying-atheist/comment-page-1/#comment-707167</link>
		<dc:creator>Madison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/?p=9325#comment-707167</guid>
		<description>Doug, 

It is patently false that Republicans and conservatives stood up to the Bush-Cheney machine.  We were all paying very close attention during the whole eight years, and that simply didn&#039;t happen. 

If conservatives were truly as moral and patriotic as they claim to be, they would have sent their leaders to the White House to tell Bush and Cheney to resign or face impeachment -- as the GOP leadership did to Nixon during the Watergate investigations. Bush and Cheney brought the United States to its knees, but what the nation heard from their running dogs on the right was ... crickets.

You guys are wasting your time with these desperate attempts to rewrite the history of the Bush era. That book has already been written and you are all complicit in their assault from within on America.

And speaking of rewriting history, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0301.green.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;actual record&lt;/a&gt; of St. Ronnie&#039;s terms in office would get him drummed out of the GOP today:

&lt;blockquote&gt;A sober review of Reagan&#039;s presidency doesn&#039;t yield the seamlessly conservative record being peddled today. Federal government expanded on his watch. The conservative desire to outlaw abortion was never seriously pursued. Reagan broke with the hardliners in his administration and compromised with the Soviets on arms control. His assault on entitlements never materialized; instead he saved Social Security in 1983. And he repeatedly ignored the fundamental conservative dogma that taxes should never be raised...

One year after his massive tax cut, Reagan agreed to a tax increase to reduce the deficit that restored fully one-third of the previous year&#039;s reduction. (In a bizarre bit of self-deception, Reagan, who never came to terms with this episode of ideological apostasy, persuaded himself that the three-year, $100 billion tax hike--the largest since World War II--was actually &quot;tax reform&quot; that closed loopholes in his earlier cut and therefore didn&#039;t count as raising taxes.)

Faced with looming deficits, Reagan raised taxes again in 1983 with a gasoline tax and once more in 1984, this time by $50 billion over three years, mainly through closing tax loopholes for business. Despite the fact that such increases were anathema to conservatives--and probably cost Reagan&#039;s successor, George H.W. Bush, reelection--Reagan raised taxes a grand total of four times just between 1982-84...

Reagan continued these &quot;modest rollbacks&quot; in his second term. The historic Tax Reform Act of 1986, though it achieved the supply side goal of lowering individual income tax rates, was a startlingly progressive reform. The plan imposed the largest corporate tax increase in history--an act utterly unimaginable for any conservative to support today. Just two years after declaring, &quot;there is no justification&quot; for taxing corporate income, Reagan raised corporate taxes by $120 billion over five years and closed corporate tax loopholes worth about $300 billion over that same period. In addition to broadening the tax base, the plan increased standard deductions and personal exemptions to the point that no family with an income below the poverty line would have to pay federal income tax. Even at the time, conservatives within Reagan&#039;s administration were aghast. According to Wall Street Journal reporters Jeffrey Birnbaum and Alan Murray, whose book Showdown at Gucci Gulch chronicles the 1986 measure, &quot;the conservative president&#039;s support for an effort once considered the bastion of liberals carried tremendous symbolic significance.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s not just the Reagan legacy that fake -- the conservative movement is built entirely on a big lie. Conservatives are just shills for corporate interests -- although most are too dim-witted to know they&#039;re being manipulated. Conservatives talk a good game about patriotism and fiscal responsibility, but they hate governing and are inept at it -- because what they really want is power. And when they get power, as they did in 2000 when they controlled the White House, the Congress and the Judiciary, what they do is hand the goods and treasure of the United States over to their corporate masters.

That&#039;s the record. You can talk around it all  you want, but those of us who ignore what conservatives say but instead watch what they do know the truth.

Your talking points about liberals are just nonsense. Go regurg them on Free Republic or some other right wing site, where, by the way, they censor comments simply because they don&#039;t agree with the writer&#039;s opinion. Fascist, much?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug, </p>
<p>It is patently false that Republicans and conservatives stood up to the Bush-Cheney machine.  We were all paying very close attention during the whole eight years, and that simply didn&#8217;t happen. </p>
<p>If conservatives were truly as moral and patriotic as they claim to be, they would have sent their leaders to the White House to tell Bush and Cheney to resign or face impeachment &#8212; as the GOP leadership did to Nixon during the Watergate investigations. Bush and Cheney brought the United States to its knees, but what the nation heard from their running dogs on the right was &#8230; crickets.</p>
<p>You guys are wasting your time with these desperate attempts to rewrite the history of the Bush era. That book has already been written and you are all complicit in their assault from within on America.</p>
<p>And speaking of rewriting history, the <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0301.green.html" rel="nofollow">actual record</a> of St. Ronnie&#8217;s terms in office would get him drummed out of the GOP today:</p>
<blockquote><p>A sober review of Reagan&#8217;s presidency doesn&#8217;t yield the seamlessly conservative record being peddled today. Federal government expanded on his watch. The conservative desire to outlaw abortion was never seriously pursued. Reagan broke with the hardliners in his administration and compromised with the Soviets on arms control. His assault on entitlements never materialized; instead he saved Social Security in 1983. And he repeatedly ignored the fundamental conservative dogma that taxes should never be raised&#8230;</p>
<p>One year after his massive tax cut, Reagan agreed to a tax increase to reduce the deficit that restored fully one-third of the previous year&#8217;s reduction. (In a bizarre bit of self-deception, Reagan, who never came to terms with this episode of ideological apostasy, persuaded himself that the three-year, $100 billion tax hike&#8211;the largest since World War II&#8211;was actually &#8220;tax reform&#8221; that closed loopholes in his earlier cut and therefore didn&#8217;t count as raising taxes.)</p>
<p>Faced with looming deficits, Reagan raised taxes again in 1983 with a gasoline tax and once more in 1984, this time by $50 billion over three years, mainly through closing tax loopholes for business. Despite the fact that such increases were anathema to conservatives&#8211;and probably cost Reagan&#8217;s successor, George H.W. Bush, reelection&#8211;Reagan raised taxes a grand total of four times just between 1982-84&#8230;</p>
<p>Reagan continued these &#8220;modest rollbacks&#8221; in his second term. The historic Tax Reform Act of 1986, though it achieved the supply side goal of lowering individual income tax rates, was a startlingly progressive reform. The plan imposed the largest corporate tax increase in history&#8211;an act utterly unimaginable for any conservative to support today. Just two years after declaring, &#8220;there is no justification&#8221; for taxing corporate income, Reagan raised corporate taxes by $120 billion over five years and closed corporate tax loopholes worth about $300 billion over that same period. In addition to broadening the tax base, the plan increased standard deductions and personal exemptions to the point that no family with an income below the poverty line would have to pay federal income tax. Even at the time, conservatives within Reagan&#8217;s administration were aghast. According to Wall Street Journal reporters Jeffrey Birnbaum and Alan Murray, whose book Showdown at Gucci Gulch chronicles the 1986 measure, &#8220;the conservative president&#8217;s support for an effort once considered the bastion of liberals carried tremendous symbolic significance.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s not just the Reagan legacy that fake &#8212; the conservative movement is built entirely on a big lie. Conservatives are just shills for corporate interests &#8212; although most are too dim-witted to know they&#8217;re being manipulated. Conservatives talk a good game about patriotism and fiscal responsibility, but they hate governing and are inept at it &#8212; because what they really want is power. And when they get power, as they did in 2000 when they controlled the White House, the Congress and the Judiciary, what they do is hand the goods and treasure of the United States over to their corporate masters.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the record. You can talk around it all  you want, but those of us who ignore what conservatives say but instead watch what they do know the truth.</p>
<p>Your talking points about liberals are just nonsense. Go regurg them on Free Republic or some other right wing site, where, by the way, they censor comments simply because they don&#8217;t agree with the writer&#8217;s opinion. Fascist, much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Parris</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/09/12/leader-of-912-march-sponsor-is-a-christ-deying-atheist/comment-page-1/#comment-707152</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Parris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 01:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/?p=9325#comment-707152</guid>
		<description>I find it fascinating to read, &quot;Pensito Review reserves the right to eliminate spam, hate speech, personal attacks, abusive language and other objectionable material,&quot; below the comment dialoge box since &quot;hate speech, personal attacks, abusive language and other objectionable material is the essence of the article  itself. The assertion that the right had no problem with Bush is utterly false. A lie. 
We have opposed socialism, including that of Bush, from the beginning. That is the nature of the Right. We are for freedom and opposed to government control of the economy. We believe government&#039;s proper role is to make theft, fraud and assault illegal and to punish law breakers. The Left wants government controlling more, eventually everything. 
Ascribing our opposition to a leftist President with a leftist agenda to &quot;racism&quot; is unconscioinable. It is a lie. It is, itself, race baiting. This website is a race-baiting bastion of leftist hate speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it fascinating to read, &#8220;Pensito Review reserves the right to eliminate spam, hate speech, personal attacks, abusive language and other objectionable material,&#8221; below the comment dialoge box since &#8220;hate speech, personal attacks, abusive language and other objectionable material is the essence of the article  itself. The assertion that the right had no problem with Bush is utterly false. A lie.<br />
We have opposed socialism, including that of Bush, from the beginning. That is the nature of the Right. We are for freedom and opposed to government control of the economy. We believe government&#8217;s proper role is to make theft, fraud and assault illegal and to punish law breakers. The Left wants government controlling more, eventually everything.<br />
Ascribing our opposition to a leftist President with a leftist agenda to &#8220;racism&#8221; is unconscioinable. It is a lie. It is, itself, race baiting. This website is a race-baiting bastion of leftist hate speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stupidly dc</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/09/12/leader-of-912-march-sponsor-is-a-christ-deying-atheist/comment-page-1/#comment-704935</link>
		<dc:creator>stupidly dc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/?p=9325#comment-704935</guid>
		<description>If all those unhealthy and obese white lard buckets and their offsprinh dressed in camo white and blue are the makings of a rand revolution in the guise of chri$tian values. with athiest  ayn randite sponser and a porker convert mormon like beck as a leader, the USA has nothing to worry about, just throw them a hamburger or a twinkie, they&#039;ll settle down and go check their blood sugar.. i am sure the rest of the world  was and is amazed  and amused at that  9-12 health protest and the pathetic forms of humanity that graced the movement..after the event the picket signs where thrown everywhere, and pepsi cans fast food wrappers littered the washington mall.. these swine are not very enviromentally friendly.. and obviously cannot see that obama is a capitolist pig working for corporations not a marxist or nazi or socialist..though social medicine  is a good practice in large populated societies.. but large obese people take far more healthcare and resources than healthy people.wash your hands children...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If all those unhealthy and obese white lard buckets and their offsprinh dressed in camo white and blue are the makings of a rand revolution in the guise of chri$tian values. with athiest  ayn randite sponser and a porker convert mormon like beck as a leader, the USA has nothing to worry about, just throw them a hamburger or a twinkie, they&#8217;ll settle down and go check their blood sugar.. i am sure the rest of the world  was and is amazed  and amused at that  9-12 health protest and the pathetic forms of humanity that graced the movement..after the event the picket signs where thrown everywhere, and pepsi cans fast food wrappers littered the washington mall.. these swine are not very enviromentally friendly.. and obviously cannot see that obama is a capitolist pig working for corporations not a marxist or nazi or socialist..though social medicine  is a good practice in large populated societies.. but large obese people take far more healthcare and resources than healthy people.wash your hands children&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trish</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/09/12/leader-of-912-march-sponsor-is-a-christ-deying-atheist/comment-page-1/#comment-704851</link>
		<dc:creator>Trish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/?p=9325#comment-704851</guid>
		<description>Not to mention that not one of these fools had a problem with the Patriot Act. If it&#039;s Bush, sure, you can see what library books I&#039;ve checked out and search my house when I&#039;m not home. But if it&#039;s Obama, hey we can read totalitarianism into a speech asking school children to work hard and go to college.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention that not one of these fools had a problem with the Patriot Act. If it&#8217;s Bush, sure, you can see what library books I&#8217;ve checked out and search my house when I&#8217;m not home. But if it&#8217;s Obama, hey we can read totalitarianism into a speech asking school children to work hard and go to college.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/09/12/leader-of-912-march-sponsor-is-a-christ-deying-atheist/comment-page-1/#comment-704850</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/?p=9325#comment-704850</guid>
		<description>Sam an Idiot: Ayn Rand is part of the story because Ron Ewart is one of her misguided followers. But you are just flat wrong that those on the right bow to a higher power. Ron Ewart was a principal sponsor of Glenn Beck&#039;s Tea Bagger march yesterday, and he is an atheist. And the fact that the Tea Baggers didn&#039;t utter a peep when a &lt;i&gt;white president&lt;/i&gt; rammed bills through the GOP Congress that spent billions and billions billions on war supplementals, the prescription drug plan and on and on &lt;i&gt;without paying for any of it&lt;/i&gt; is proof that the Tea Bagger movement is about nothing but racism.

Stephen - The phrases &quot;godless atheist&quot; and &quot;Christ denier&quot; are humorous goads at the Christianist Tea Baggers that mimic the sort of terminology they use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam an Idiot: Ayn Rand is part of the story because Ron Ewart is one of her misguided followers. But you are just flat wrong that those on the right bow to a higher power. Ron Ewart was a principal sponsor of Glenn Beck&#8217;s Tea Bagger march yesterday, and he is an atheist. And the fact that the Tea Baggers didn&#8217;t utter a peep when a <i>white president</i> rammed bills through the GOP Congress that spent billions and billions billions on war supplementals, the prescription drug plan and on and on <i>without paying for any of it</i> is proof that the Tea Bagger movement is about nothing but racism.</p>
<p>Stephen &#8211; The phrases &#8220;godless atheist&#8221; and &#8220;Christ denier&#8221; are humorous goads at the Christianist Tea Baggers that mimic the sort of terminology they use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/09/12/leader-of-912-march-sponsor-is-a-christ-deying-atheist/comment-page-1/#comment-704846</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/?p=9325#comment-704846</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not quite sure what to make of the phrase, &quot;Godless, atheist.&quot;  That goes without saying.  I am an atheist, thus godless.  I am also &quot;Christ-denying&quot; but that neither makes me an atheist nor godless.  While I appreciate you providing this information about this vile character, the fact that he is an atheist only goes to the issue that the wingnuts do not know who they are following.  My confusion is with the terminology used in this piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not quite sure what to make of the phrase, &#8220;Godless, atheist.&#8221;  That goes without saying.  I am an atheist, thus godless.  I am also &#8220;Christ-denying&#8221; but that neither makes me an atheist nor godless.  While I appreciate you providing this information about this vile character, the fact that he is an atheist only goes to the issue that the wingnuts do not know who they are following.  My confusion is with the terminology used in this piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taking Back America, One Uneducated White Racist At A Time</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/09/12/leader-of-912-march-sponsor-is-a-christ-deying-atheist/comment-page-1/#comment-704845</link>
		<dc:creator>Taking Back America, One Uneducated White Racist At A Time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/?p=9325#comment-704845</guid>
		<description>[...] Beck” during CNN live shot, The 9/12 Conversation, Tea Partiers Are Confused and Also Racist, Leader of Anti-Govt. Group Funding Glenn Beck’s 9/12 March Is a Christ-Denying Atheist, Meanwhile, back on planet earth, and Protesting Against Imaginary [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Beck” during CNN live shot, The 9/12 Conversation, Tea Partiers Are Confused and Also Racist, Leader of Anti-Govt. Group Funding Glenn Beck’s 9/12 March Is a Christ-Denying Atheist, Meanwhile, back on planet earth, and Protesting Against Imaginary [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam an IDIOT</title>
		<link>http://www.pensitoreview.com/2009/09/12/leader-of-912-march-sponsor-is-a-christ-deying-atheist/comment-page-1/#comment-704840</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam an IDIOT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pensitoreview.com/?p=9325#comment-704840</guid>
		<description>UM..what the hell does AYN RAND have to do with this?  Oh because she is an atheist?  lol  Let me give you a clue SAM SIMPLE..here is the difference between the left and the right...the right believes on a higher power, but we also believe it is your right to NOT BELIEVE, as you are answerable for your own actions..so what if he is an atheist?  Its his right to choose...which is the fundamental underpinning of this whole movement.  The Left wants to eliminate the options and right to choose our healthcare...I may not necessarily agree with peoples choices , but I will defend their right to choose those choices unfettered from Government Interference.  

YOU, SAM have the right to choose to have your healthcare overtaken by the gov&#039;t, I may disagree but I will fight for your right to BE ABLE TO CHOOSE and believe what you wish.  Once one group of people begin trying to strip away a nations citizens of their right to be heard, and free choice and free will, then it is time to stand up and fight.  If this thing devolves into violence it will be sad and uncivilized, but the left embraces not being civilized (i.e. the massive trash left after Obama&#039;s Inauguration by the people who want to &quot;save the planet&quot; vs how clean the patriots left it on 9/12..wonder who really cares the most..not just in words but in deeds...huh?  lol)

Its time for the &quot;divide and conquer&quot; politics to end and the government to &quot;listen&quot; to their people....its time for the people to stand up and discipline their government, as its BY THE PEOPLE FOR THE PEOPLE.  Its time for the race baiting to stop...because if nothing else the &quot;Law of Unintended Consequences&quot; is going to come back and bite you...if you scream &quot;racism&quot; enough anytime there isnt truly racism, then you demean what it represents to the point that if a person who might actually become a victiim of racism will be ignored because of the &quot;cry wolf&quot; nature of the left now using that term..THINK ABOUT IT....If you truly wish to stamp out what little racism thats left, then dont abuse the term..hold it sacred...otherwise you diminish completely what it stands for. Period...Good Luck America!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UM..what the hell does AYN RAND have to do with this?  Oh because she is an atheist?  lol  Let me give you a clue SAM SIMPLE..here is the difference between the left and the right&#8230;the right believes on a higher power, but we also believe it is your right to NOT BELIEVE, as you are answerable for your own actions..so what if he is an atheist?  Its his right to choose&#8230;which is the fundamental underpinning of this whole movement.  The Left wants to eliminate the options and right to choose our healthcare&#8230;I may not necessarily agree with peoples choices , but I will defend their right to choose those choices unfettered from Government Interference.  </p>
<p>YOU, SAM have the right to choose to have your healthcare overtaken by the gov&#8217;t, I may disagree but I will fight for your right to BE ABLE TO CHOOSE and believe what you wish.  Once one group of people begin trying to strip away a nations citizens of their right to be heard, and free choice and free will, then it is time to stand up and fight.  If this thing devolves into violence it will be sad and uncivilized, but the left embraces not being civilized (i.e. the massive trash left after Obama&#8217;s Inauguration by the people who want to &#8220;save the planet&#8221; vs how clean the patriots left it on 9/12..wonder who really cares the most..not just in words but in deeds&#8230;huh?  lol)</p>
<p>Its time for the &#8220;divide and conquer&#8221; politics to end and the government to &#8220;listen&#8221; to their people&#8230;.its time for the people to stand up and discipline their government, as its BY THE PEOPLE FOR THE PEOPLE.  Its time for the race baiting to stop&#8230;because if nothing else the &#8220;Law of Unintended Consequences&#8221; is going to come back and bite you&#8230;if you scream &#8220;racism&#8221; enough anytime there isnt truly racism, then you demean what it represents to the point that if a person who might actually become a victiim of racism will be ignored because of the &#8220;cry wolf&#8221; nature of the left now using that term..THINK ABOUT IT&#8230;.If you truly wish to stamp out what little racism thats left, then dont abuse the term..hold it sacred&#8230;otherwise you diminish completely what it stands for. Period&#8230;Good Luck America!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

