Comments on: At Tea Bagger Convention, WingNutDaily Editor Reboots Birther Conspiracy

By: Madison

Madison — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:35:55 +0000

Yeah, Jat — where were you guys when Bush and Cheney were shredding the Constitution? You should have spoken up then, because you all have ZERO credibility now.

By: Stump Toen Hero

Stump Toen Hero — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:52:19 +0000

Two officials in the Hawaiian Archives department and the Governor of Hawaii have all attested that they have personally seen the base document from which the Certificate of Live Birth originates.

The HOSPITAL sent birth announcements to TWO local papers.

The document that that then candidate Obama presented for examination, laser printed or not, had a raised seal.

There is 1 million times more evidence and one thousands more experts who contend that the twin towers were brought down by demolition than there is evidence, experts or witness that support the claim President Obama was not born in Hawaii. So which “alleged” crime deserves a serious investigation?

By: jat dee

jat dee — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:50:14 +0000

The last time I checked a US citizen has no need to justify his free speech anyone else…I want to know if Obama is legit? Why don’t you?…… Shades of Al Gore tactics, saying the there’s a consensus and that the time to debate is over, HA!!!…..We know how that one turned out, don’t we? ……
Wait a minute, I take the free speech comment back, the last time I checked my right to free speech has changed, It is officially under attack by the Obama administration and the G20 UN hacks via the internet security censorship bill……Sites like Infowars.com and others are being blocked in The US, Australia, China, Spain, New Zeland etc…All in a coordinated assault ???? All at the same time????..That’s well over a billion people…..Its a fraud just like the war on terror, read the MIAC report, the American people are the reason for Nothcom and Homeland security, not terrorists……They (Govt) are afraid of what we’ll do when the majority of the people finds out the extent of the the banker theft and fraud, and vicious attacks on our and 1st, 2nd, state, and national .sovereignty……

By: forseti

forseti — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:38:49 +0000

The Birthers are not the issue. The issue is the U.S. Constitution. The first paragraph of the United States Supreme Court’s website makes the following promise to the American People – “As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution.” To date, the United States Supreme Court has failed to do anything in furtherance of the search for the truth about Obama’s natural born citizen status. Furthermore, not one single solitary person or agency in the Executive, Legislative, or the rest of the Judicial branch of government has done anything other than accept Obama’s posted Certification of Live Birth as conclusive evidence of his alleged birthplace.

Mr. Obama claims that he was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961. As his only evidence that he meets the Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that a President be a natural born citizen, he produced a scant summary document called a “Certification of Live Birth,” which he posted on his website under the title: “Barack Obama’s Official Birth Certificate.”

At first blush, it is case closed. A closer examination of the facts, however, reveals that Mr. Obama failed to point out on his website that his posted “Official Birth Certificate,” as he called it, is actually a 2007 computer-generated, laser-printed scant summary document of his 1961 vital record(s) on file with the Hawaii State Department of Health. What we do not know, however, is what 1961 vital record the Certification of Live Birth is summarizing.

In 1961 there were at least six different procedures available to obtain a vital record (birth certificate) that the Certification of Live Birth could be summarizing. Five of the six procedures lacked adequate indicia of reliability and trustworthiness because they were fraught with the potential for fraud. That said, an “official” state-issued document that summarizes a document that lacks adequate indicia of reliability and trustworthiness is not worth the paper it is printed on. Scans of the original Hawaii Revised Laws from that era can be found at http://birther.com.

I’ll close this post with a quote: “All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”