Here’s a story that puts the lie to the myth of the “liberal media.” Too bad hardly anyone has been paying attention.

Sen. Dick Shelby (R-Ala.), a snarling, bloodthirsty Cheneyite neo-con, abruptly ended his attempt to force the Obama administration to approve two pork projects for his home state after being called out for taking the nominees “hostage” by New York’s center-right New York Daily News on Sunday.

Even so, it is unclear whether the administration will eventually capitulate and award the projects to Alabama.

The projects include a facility to build Air Force aerial refueling tankers and a new FBI Terrorist Device Analytical Center.

The story burbled to the surface last week when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s office announced that Shelby had put a blanket hold on 70 Obama nominees, including a Defense Department position overseeing deployments to Afghanistan.

The story popped up again on Friday when White House spokesman Robert Gibbs chided Shelby for placing his political need to bring home the bacon over the interests of the nation:

“If you needed one example of what’s wrong with this town, it might be that one senator can hold up 70 qualified individuals to make government better because he didn’t get his earmarks.”

Imagine for a moment the bloody hell that would have been raised by Fox News, right-wing radio and Beltway pundits of all stripes if a Democratic senator had put a blanket hold on 70 Bush nominees for security-related positions.

Despite the mentions by Reid’s office and Gibb, Shelby’s blanket hold barely made headlines. One exception was the New York Daily News, in an editorial on Sunday titled, “Abuse of process: Sen. Shelby holds 70 nominees hostage to Alabama pork “:

Shelby’s fit of pique would be bad enough if it stemmed from some principled disagreement over a nominee or two or three. But he doesn’t actually care about the nominees or the jobs. Shelby is in a snit because he’s afraid a $35 billion Pentagon order for aerial refueling tankers might go to Boeing – rather than to a firm that has promised to build the tankers in his state. He’s also miffed, according to his staff, that a proposed FBI facility might not get built in Alabama.

Senators have long used holds as behind-the-scenes bargaining tactics; members can ask party leaders to bottle up a nominee or measure until they are placated. But nobody can recall a hold this sweeping, or one provoked by such selfishness.

This is Richard Shelby: So bent on bringing home the bacon, he’s willing to starve the rest of us.

In fact, Shelby is still holding a few hostages:

Moving forward, [Shelby spokesman Jonathan Graffeo] said Shelby has placed holds on the following nominees: Terry Yonkers, Assistant Secretary of the Air Force; Frank Kendall, Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics; and Erin Conaton, Under Secretary of the Air Force. Graffeo said the holds will continue until the Obama administration agrees to reexamine the air refueling tanker contract and improvised explosive device lab that led to Shelby’s controversial wider holds.

Graffeo denied Shelby had bowed to the criticism but rather declared victory for the senator, alleging that the holds had merely been meant to get the president’s attention.