Christine O’Donnell Says Govt ‘Czars’ Are Unconstitutional – Is She Really That Stupid?

Visit for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

“Article 1, Section 9 says no title of nobility should granted by the United States, there you go. I would say to President Obama that czar is a title of nobility and therefore unconstitutional.”

Delaware GOP-tea party candidate Christine O’Donnnell, who appears not to know that “czar” is not an official title or that Reagan had a “drug czar” to oversee Nancy’s pet project, the “war on drugs,” or that George W. Bush had 32 czars on his staff.


  • Rvrctyrdnck
    September 22, 2010 - 3:11 pm | Permalink

    The Deleware Ditz stikes again.

    If you want to hear her theme song click this link

  • cleanhippie
    September 22, 2010 - 3:37 pm | Permalink

    Yes, she is that stupid, as is Palin, Buchannan, Angle, Brewer……

  • majii
    September 24, 2010 - 7:51 am | Permalink

    This statement shows that McDonnell doesn’t keep up with what goes on in the federal government or hasn’t done much reading about the history of our government in the modern era. It is shameful that some people who will vote for her think she has a valid point when she doesn’t. That she doesn’t know that Article 1, Section 9 is related to America’s colonial period and our founders’ rocky relationship with King George III shows that she doesn’t know as much as she thinks she knows.

  • Jeff Johnson
    September 28, 2010 - 8:34 am | Permalink

    Who better to represent the stupid masses?

  • Pingback: Delaware Tea Party Candidate, well, turns out she is an effin liar - Page 7 - - Mercedes-Benz Discussion Forum

  • Dave
    November 22, 2010 - 4:47 pm | Permalink

    majii,I believe you are wrong.Art 1 section can be interpreted to fit today

  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *